Sign In / Sign Out
Navigation for Entire University
- ASU Home
- My ASU
- Colleges and Schools
- Map and Locations
To truly provide a customer-centric service, we must consider both results and customer experience, and work to find a balance. When designing a service process, do not assume you know best, do not let the operating environment force you to develop a poor service, and take the time to test the process before rolling it out.
While working on my car last weekend, as I was contorted at an odd angle with my arm stuck in a small space between the engine and firewall, trying to replace the spark plugs, I started thinking about automotive engineering and design. Specifically, I was wondering who designs car engines in a way that you cannot easily work on them, can’t get your hand into spaces while holding a tool, and cannot move your hand enough to unscrew a part. I know that they have to fit the engine into the available space dictated by the car’s design, but it is getting very difficult for owners to maintain them - and for the mechanics who charge a lot of money to make repairs.
The thing is, like car designers and engineers, when we design or improve services for our customers, we often focus on the result of the service rather than the customer’s experience as they go through the process. To truly provide a customer-centric service, we must consider both results and customer experience, and work to find a balance. When designing a service process, do not assume you know best, do not let the operating environment force you to develop a poor service, and take the time to test the process before rolling it out.
When you are designing or fixing a process, you cannot just assume that you know what is best for your customers. Years ago, I worked for an organization where the leadership felt they knew what the customers wanted, even better than the customers themselves. The leaders relied on their many years of industry experience and their personal interests to provide the products and services the company offered. Unfortunately, this was a very narrow view, and as customer’s needs and tastes changed, these assumptions backfired. The organization faltered, fell behind the competition, and has since been struggling to stay afloat.
Rather than making assumptions, I would recommend the following:
One of the easiest excuses to make for poor service design is that the process has to be created in a certain way because of organizational limitations. These can be factors like policies, a lack of staff, inadequate technology, or leadership expectations. Regardless of the reason, poor service is poor service; and organizations must make every effort to remove or minimize barriers to excellence. Here are some recommendations for addressing barriers.
If the customer cannot navigate the process, or if the process is not capable of meeting the customers’ needs, then they cannot get the benefit of the services you provide. For this reason, when you design a new process or improve an existing one, you must carefully test it from the customers’ point of view to make sure it works properly.
Testing should be done by people who are experts, and by people who have the same level of knowledge, skills, and understanding of the process as your actual customers. The experts will be able to see how well the process works from a technical standpoint, but they will also have an advantage that your regular customers will not. Experts will most likely have an easier time getting around problems in the process than your customers. For this reason, they are likely to underestimate problems that the customers will encounter, or overestimate the customers’ ability to self-solve problems within the process. This is where testing by non-experts will be helpful. The non-expert feedback will give you the most realistic view of the potential customer experience. They can identify what works well, where customers may get stuck in the process, or where there are opportunities for improving the customer experience.
Additionally, when testing a newly designed or improved process, make sure you stress test it. This means simulating the maximum workload that the process will need to be capable of supporting. The testing will help you to ensure that the service you provide will be able to handle the highest customer demand that you expect to encounter, and still allow for unexpected variation in demand and future growth.
One last thing to consider is that just designing or improving a process is not the end of the road. After you have completed the process and moved it into active use, you need to check back and make sure the process is doing what it is supposed to, that customers’ needs have not changed, and that there are no new customer groups that must be accommodated. It is also a good idea to watch for trends and identify potential issues so that you can address them before the customers experience any problems.
Keeping these things in mind will allow you to design a process that makes services better for customers, rather than making the experience harder for them. The idea of a service is to lift the customers’ burden and meet their needs in a way that makes their interactions easier and their lives better. Please make sure the work you do is not engineering a harder process for your customers to navigate. As always, I welcome your questions and feedback. You can email me at email@example.com.
About the Author
Clayton Taylor, MBA, is a Management Research Analyst, Pr. and Certified Six Sigma Master Black Belt working in the Office of the Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer at Arizona State University. He currently consults with nine diverse Business and Finance operational areas to lower costs, improve operational efficiency and provide the highest quality customer experience to internal and external customers. Mr. Taylor can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.